Builder.ai: From AI Promise to Controversy – A Startup’s Rise and Fall

Once hailed as an AI game-changer in app development, Builder.ai, founded by Suchin Dev Dugal, presented a bold vision: build apps effortlessly through automation. But behind the sleek interface and confident marketing was a very different reality.

The Pitch That Hooked the World

Builder.ai, initially known as Engineer.ai, marketed app development as a five-step, AI-powered process. Its Builder Studio platform promised end-to-end services, appealing to non-tech users. Investors, especially SoftBank, bought into the vision—lured by the idea of 80% automation.

Behind the Curtain: Outsourcing Over AI

Despite the AI hype, Builder.ai largely relied on over 700 outsourced engineers. The promised automation? Mostly manual. Lavish retreats, like one in Vietnam, painted a rosy public image—while internal cracks widened.

A Wall Street Journal report later exposed inflated revenue claims, exaggerated workforce numbers, and employee concerns about authenticity. Yet, funding kept coming, with the company showcasing impressive—but misleading—growth.

Rebranding and Resistance

In response to criticism, the company rebranded to Builder.ai. But the core operations stayed the same. Legal troubles, including a lawsuit from a former executive and money laundering allegations involving Dugal, deepened the crisis.

A new CEO later discovered massive financial inconsistencies, leading to layoffs, halted operations, and a loss of credibility.

Why It Matters

Builder.ai’s collapse reflects a broader trend: startups inflating AI capabilities to chase funding—much like the dot-com bubble. The gap between perception and performance raises questions about transparency in tech.

Even as firms like Salesforce say AI can now handle 30–50% of tasks, Builder.ai’s claims of 80% automation were far from reality—built on a narrative, not a foundation.

What Could Have Been Done Differently — And What We Can Learn

The collapse of Builder.ai is not just the story of a single startup gone wrong — it’s a reflection of a deeper issue across the tech landscape: the unchecked use of “AI” as a buzzword, and the consequences of chasing hype over honesty.

What Could Builder.ai Have Done Differently?

1. Transparency Over Hype: Instead of claiming 80% automation, Builder.ai could have clearly communicated the real blend of human effort and automation. Honesty earns trust — especially in tech.

2. Gradual Innovation: Real breakthroughs take time. Instead of trying to "disrupt" overnight, a more measured, iterative approach to building true AI capability would have avoided overpromising.

3. Internal Accountability: Listening to internal voices and concerns from employees, developers, and early clients might have corrected course early on.

4. Avoiding the Vanity Metrics Trap:Builder.ai emphasized funding, valuation, and projected growth over real user outcomes. Focusing on sustainable revenue and customer satisfaction could have built long-term credibility.

Takeaway: The story of Builder.ai is a powerful reminder that in the world of startups, hype must meet substance. For investors, consumers, and founders alike—honesty and credibility matter more than ever.

By Inkwav Editorial

For more stories on tech, media, innovation and creativity, follow us.